Lender Register

States › California › Mono County

Mono County, California

Mortgage lending record for properties in the county, calendar year 2024.

FIPS 06051
Households 5,744
Population 12,991

HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws. The data do not include some legitimate credit risk considerations for loan approval and loan pricing decisions. Cells under 25 applications are withheld.

Lenders reported 637 mortgage applications in Mono County, California, for 2024, and originated 369 loans worth $226m.

That is 64.2 originations per 1,000 households, against 37.7 for California and 48.0 nationally.

The county's denial rate was 22.1%, below the state rate of 24.8%. The median rate spread on originated loans was 0.5 percentage points and 14.5% of originations were 1.5 points or more above the average prime offer rate.

4 lenders reached 25 applications in the county; the most active by originations were Crosscountry Mortgage, LLC (107), United Wholesale Mortgage (31) and Us Bank, N.A. (19).

Originations were up 15% on 2023.

637applications, 2024
369loans originated$226m
22.1%denial rateCA 24.8% · US 24.3%
64.2originations per 1,000 householdsCA 37.7 · US 48.0

Most active lenders

#LenderApplicationsOriginationsAmountDenial rateMedian spread
1Crosscountry Mortgage, LLC134107$58m0.0%—
2United Wholesale Mortgage5031$16m24.4%—
3Us Bank, N.A.3619$14m40.6%—
4Rocket Mortgage2918$8.2m37.9%—

Lenders with at least 25 applications in the county, by originations; up to 40 shown of 4. Denial rate is denials over decided applications in this county.

Compared with California and the nation

MeasureThis countyCaliforniaUnited States
Denial rate22.1%24.8%24.3%
Median rate spread, pp0.50.40.3
Originations with spread of 1.5 pp or more14.5%19.9%15.6%
Average originated loan$612k$566k$329k
Originations per 1,000 households64.237.748.0
Home purchase share of originations66.4%51.2%57.0%
FHA-insured share4.3%11.4%13.4%
VA-guaranteed share3.5%4.8%7.9%

Rate spread distribution

Below 0 pp24.6%
0 to 0.5 pp25.8%
0.5 to 1 pp17.6%
1 to 1.5 pp17.6%
1.5 to 3 pp10.5%
3 or more pp3.9%

Share of 256 originated loans with a reported rate spread, by spread over the average prime offer rate (outlined bar: California). Loans at 1.5 points or more on a first lien are what Regulation C calls higher-priced.

Loan purpose and loan type

By purpose

Home purchase 66% (245)Home improvement 7% (26)Refinancing 10% (36)Cash-out refinancing 10% (38)Other purpose 7% (24)

By type

Conventional 92% (340)FHA 4% (16)VA 4% (13)

Trend by year

ApplicationsOriginations

0523.51,0472022: 1,047 Applications2023: 561 Applications2024: 637 Applications2022: 629 Originations2023: 322 Originations2024: 369 Originations202220232024
Applications and originations in Mono County, 2022–2024

This countyCalifornia

0%13.3%26.6%2022: 21.6% This county2023: 24% This county2024: 22.1% This county202220232024
Denial rate by year, state rate dashed

Questions and answers

Which lenders are most active in Mono County, CA?

By 2024 originations: Crosscountry Mortgage, LLC (107), United Wholesale Mortgage (31), Us Bank, N.A. (19), Rocket Mortgage (18). 4 lenders had at least 25 applications in the county.

What is the mortgage denial rate in Mono County?

22.1% of decided applications were denied in 2024, against 24.8% across California and 24.3% nationally.

How many mortgages were originated in Mono County in 2024?

369 loans totalling $226m, from 637 applications; 64.2 originations per 1,000 households.

Where does this data come from?

From the 2024 public HMDA loan/application register (FFIEC and CFPB), by property county; households from the Census Bureau American Community Survey 2024 five-year estimates.

Provenance

Source: HMDA public loan/application register 2022, 2023, 2024 (FFIEC and CFPB, public domain), records with a property in county FIPS 06051; households and population from the U.S. Census Bureau (ACS 2024 five-year estimates; Vintage 2024 population estimates). Built 30 Sep 2026; data through 1 Aug 2026. See methodology and corrections.