Lender Register

States › Utah › Garfield County

Garfield County, Utah

Mortgage lending record for properties in the county, calendar year 2024.

FIPS 49017
Households 2,042
Population 5,290

HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws. The data do not include some legitimate credit risk considerations for loan approval and loan pricing decisions. Cells under 25 applications are withheld.

Lenders reported 252 mortgage applications in Garfield County, Utah, for 2024, and originated 134 loans worth $30m.

That is 65.6 originations per 1,000 households, against 77.6 for Utah and 48.0 nationally.

The county's denial rate was 28.3%, above the state rate of 20.5%. The median rate spread on originated loans was 0.4 percentage points and 10.9% of originations were 1.5 points or more above the average prime offer rate.

3 lenders reached 25 applications in the county; the most active by originations were State Bank of Southern Utah (36), Mountain America Federal Credit Union (18) and Zions Bancorporation, N.A. (10).

Originations were up 24% on 2023.

252applications, 2024
134loans originated$30m
28.3%denial rateUT 20.5% · US 24.3%
65.6originations per 1,000 householdsUT 77.6 · US 48.0

Most active lenders

#LenderApplicationsOriginationsAmountDenial rateMedian spread
1State Bank of Southern Utah5336$6.1m17.4%—
2Mountain America Federal Credit Union4018$2.4m38.7%—
3Zions Bancorporation, N.A.3010$870k33.3%—

Lenders with at least 25 applications in the county, by originations; up to 40 shown of 3. Denial rate is denials over decided applications in this county.

Compared with Utah and the nation

MeasureThis countyUtahUnited States
Denial rate28.3%20.5%24.3%
Median rate spread, pp0.40.40.3
Originations with spread of 1.5 pp or more10.9%14.2%15.6%
Average originated loan$222k$343k$329k
Originations per 1,000 households65.677.648.0
Home purchase share of originations42.5%49.0%57.0%
FHA-insured share9.0%14.1%13.4%
VA-guaranteed share3.7%4.7%7.9%

Rate spread distribution

Below 0 pp17.2%
0 to 0.5 pp32.8%
0.5 to 1 pp27.3%
1 to 1.5 pp11.7%
1.5 to 3 pp5.5%
3 or more pp5.5%

Share of 128 originated loans with a reported rate spread, by spread over the average prime offer rate (outlined bar: Utah). Loans at 1.5 points or more on a first lien are what Regulation C calls higher-priced.

Loan purpose and loan type

By purpose

Home purchase 43% (57)Home improvement 10% (13)Refinancing 16% (22)Cash-out refinancing 10% (14)Other purpose 21% (28)

By type

Conventional 86% (115)FHA 9% (12)VA 4% (5)USDA 1% (2)

Trend by year

ApplicationsOriginations

0137.52752022: 275 Applications2023: 205 Applications2024: 252 Applications2022: 157 Originations2023: 108 Originations2024: 134 Originations202220232024
Applications and originations in Garfield County, 2022–2024

This countyUtah

0%14.2%28.3%2022: 22.7% This county2023: 25.6% This county2024: 28.3% This county202220232024
Denial rate by year, state rate dashed

Questions and answers

Which lenders are most active in Garfield County, UT?

By 2024 originations: State Bank of Southern Utah (36), Mountain America Federal Credit Union (18), Zions Bancorporation, N.A. (10). 3 lenders had at least 25 applications in the county.

What is the mortgage denial rate in Garfield County?

28.3% of decided applications were denied in 2024, against 20.5% across Utah and 24.3% nationally.

How many mortgages were originated in Garfield County in 2024?

134 loans totalling $30m, from 252 applications; 65.6 originations per 1,000 households.

Where does this data come from?

From the 2024 public HMDA loan/application register (FFIEC and CFPB), by property county; households from the Census Bureau American Community Survey 2024 five-year estimates.

Provenance

Source: HMDA public loan/application register 2022, 2023, 2024 (FFIEC and CFPB, public domain), records with a property in county FIPS 49017; households and population from the U.S. Census Bureau (ACS 2024 five-year estimates; Vintage 2024 population estimates). Built 30 Sep 2026; data through 1 Aug 2026. See methodology and corrections.