Lender Register

Lenders › American Financial Network, Inc. › Georgia

American Financial Network, Inc. in Georgia

HMDA record for properties in Georgia, calendar year 2024. National record · Georgia overview

LEI 5493008NWHQT1R22C024
Reporting agency Department of Housing and Urban Development
State Georgia

HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws. The data do not include some legitimate credit risk considerations for loan approval and loan pricing decisions. Cells under 25 applications are withheld.

In Georgia, American Financial Network, Inc. reported 1,017 applications and 528 originations for 2024, $136m in all.

Its denial rate in the state was 19.5%, below the Georgia rate of 26.9% across all lenders and compared with the lender's national rate of 13.2%.

The median rate spread on its Georgia originations was 0.8 percentage points (state median 0.4).

Applications in the state were down 19% on 2023.

1,017applications in GA, 20244.8% of the lender's total
528loans originated$136m
19.5%denial rateGA all lenders 26.9%
0.8 ppmedian rate spreadGA 0.4 pp

Compared with the state and the lender's national record

MeasureIn GeorgiaGeorgia, all lendersAmerican Financial Network, Inc., all statesUnited States
Denial rate19.5%26.9%13.2%24.3%
Median rate spread, pp0.80.40.60.3
Originations with spread of 1.5 pp or more33.6%17.5%20.7%15.6%
Average originated loan$258k$313k$335k$329k
Home purchase share83.5%57.0%81.3%57.0%
FHA-insured share43.2%18.3%34.9%13.4%
VA-guaranteed share13.1%11.6%8.5%7.9%

Trend by year

ApplicationsOriginations

01015.52,0312022: 2,031 Applications2023: 1,250 Applications2024: 1,017 Applications2022: 806 Originations2023: 590 Originations2024: 528 Originations202220232024
American Financial Network, Inc. in Georgia: applications and originations, 2022–2024

This lender in stateGeorgia, all lenders

0%14.2%28.4%2022: 13.1% This lender in state2023: 21.7% This lender in state2024: 19.5% This lender in state202220232024
Denial rate by year, state rate dashed

Loan purpose and loan type in Georgia

By purpose

Home purchase 84% (441)Refinancing 5% (29)Cash-out refinancing 11% (58)

By type

Conventional 42% (223)FHA 43% (228)VA 13% (69)USDA 2% (8)

Denial reasons as coded

Debt-to-income ratio43.8%
Credit history35.4%
Other7.7%
Unverifiable information6.2%
Collateral4.6%
Credit application incomplete1.5%
Employment history0.8%
Insufficient cash (downpayment, closing costs)0%
Mortgage insurance denied0%

Share of 130 denials in Georgia by first denial reason coded (outlined bar: all lenders in the state).

Counties in Georgia

CountyApplicationsOriginationsAmountDenial rate
Fulton County11952$15m26.0%
DeKalb County8942$9.3m25.0%
Henry County7136$9.6m25.0%
Gwinnett County6432$9.6m17.1%
Clayton County6131$5.6m20.0%
Cobb County5022$6.9m29.0%
Effingham County2818$5.5m—
Chatham County3215$3.5m—
Douglas County2714$2.7m—

Counties with at least 25 applications, by originations.

Questions and answers

How many mortgages did American Financial Network, Inc. originate in Georgia in 2024?

528 loans totalling $136m, from 1,017 applications reported for properties in Georgia.

What is American Financial Network, Inc.'s denial rate in Georgia?

19.5% of decided applications in Georgia were denied, against 26.9% for all lenders in the state and 13.2% for this lender nationally. HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws.

Which Georgia counties does American Financial Network, Inc. lend in most?

By originations: Fulton County (52), DeKalb County (42), Henry County (36), Gwinnett County (32), Clayton County (31).

Where does this data come from?

From the 2024 public HMDA loan/application register (FFIEC and CFPB), filtered to the lender's LEI and the property state. Cells under 25 applications are withheld.

Provenance

Source: HMDA public loan/application register 2022, 2023, 2024 (FFIEC and CFPB, public domain), records for this LEI with a property in Georgia. Built 30 Sep 2026; data through 1 Aug 2026. See methodology and corrections.