Lender Register

Lenders › Financial Partners Credit Unio › California

Financial Partners Credit Unio in California

HMDA record for properties in California, calendar year 2024. National record · California overview

LEI 549300B0HNWBV7RX2661
Reporting agency National Credit Union Administration
State California

HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws. The data do not include some legitimate credit risk considerations for loan approval and loan pricing decisions. Cells under 25 applications are withheld.

In California, Financial Partners Credit Unio reported 1,562 applications and 808 originations for 2024, $211m in all.

Its denial rate in the state was 28.6%, above the California rate of 24.8% across all lenders and compared with the lender's national rate of 29.3%.

The median rate spread on its California originations was 0.1 percentage points (state median 0.4).

Applications in the state were down 6% on 2023.

1,562applications in CA, 202496.8% of the lender's total
808loans originated$211m
28.6%denial rateCA all lenders 24.8%
0.1 ppmedian rate spreadCA 0.4 pp

Compared with the state and the lender's national record

MeasureIn CaliforniaCalifornia, all lendersFinancial Partners Credit Unio, all statesUnited States
Denial rate28.6%24.8%29.3%24.3%
Median rate spread, pp0.10.40.10.3
Originations with spread of 1.5 pp or more19.4%19.9%17.0%15.6%
Average originated loan$261k$566k$262k$329k
Home purchase share11.1%51.2%12.7%57.0%
FHA-insured share0.1%11.4%0.1%13.4%
VA-guaranteed share0.0%4.8%0.0%7.9%

Trend by year

ApplicationsOriginations

01589.53,1792022: 3,179 Applications2023: 1,657 Applications2024: 1,562 Applications2022: 2,015 Originations2023: 834 Originations2024: 808 Originations202220232024
Financial Partners Credit Unio in California: applications and originations, 2022–2024

This lender in stateCalifornia, all lenders

0%16.1%32.2%2022: 18.4% This lender in state2023: 32.2% This lender in state2024: 28.6% This lender in state202220232024
Denial rate by year, state rate dashed

Loan purpose and loan type in California

By purpose

Home purchase 11% (90)Home improvement 42% (340)Refinancing 4% (33)Cash-out refinancing 6% (50)Other purpose 37% (295)

By type

Conventional 100% (807)FHA 0% (1)

Denial reasons as coded

Debt-to-income ratio51.4%
Other18.9%
Collateral10.6%
Credit history10.1%
Credit application incomplete6.6%
Unverifiable information1.7%
Insufficient cash (downpayment, closing costs)0.7%
Employment history0%
Mortgage insurance denied0%

Share of 407 denials in California by first denial reason coded (outlined bar: all lenders in the state).

Counties in California

CountyApplicationsOriginationsAmountDenial rate
Los Angeles County810407$117m28.6%
Orange County310182$36m20.4%
San Bernardino County12568$18m30.4%
Riverside County12955$8.7m43.1%
San Diego County7236$6.5m29.7%

Counties with at least 25 applications, by originations.

Questions and answers

How many mortgages did Financial Partners Credit Unio originate in California in 2024?

808 loans totalling $211m, from 1,562 applications reported for properties in California.

What is Financial Partners Credit Unio's denial rate in California?

28.6% of decided applications in California were denied, against 24.8% for all lenders in the state and 29.3% for this lender nationally. HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws.

Which California counties does Financial Partners Credit Unio lend in most?

By originations: Los Angeles County (407), Orange County (182), San Bernardino County (68), Riverside County (55), San Diego County (36).

Where does this data come from?

From the 2024 public HMDA loan/application register (FFIEC and CFPB), filtered to the lender's LEI and the property state. Cells under 25 applications are withheld.

Provenance

Source: HMDA public loan/application register 2022, 2023, 2024 (FFIEC and CFPB, public domain), records for this LEI with a property in California. Built 30 Sep 2026; data through 1 Aug 2026. See methodology and corrections.