Lender Register

Lenders › Kind Lending, LLC › New Jersey

Kind Lending, LLC in New Jersey

HMDA record for properties in New Jersey, calendar year 2024. National record · New Jersey overview

LEI 549300MZ8VZJOVC63092
Reporting agency Department of Housing and Urban Development
State New Jersey

HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws. The data do not include some legitimate credit risk considerations for loan approval and loan pricing decisions. Cells under 25 applications are withheld.

Kind Lending, LLC's 2024 HMDA record for New Jersey covers 580 applications, 368 of them originated, worth $177m.

Its denial rate in the state was 28.7%, above the New Jersey rate of 26.0% across all lenders and compared with the lender's national rate of 27.2%.

The median rate spread on its New Jersey originations was 0.5 percentage points (state median 0.4).

Applications in the state were up 235% on 2023.

580applications in NJ, 20242.0% of the lender's total
368loans originated$177m
28.7%denial rateNJ all lenders 26.0%
0.5 ppmedian rate spreadNJ 0.4 pp

Compared with the state and the lender's national record

MeasureIn New JerseyNew Jersey, all lendersKind Lending, LLC, all statesUnited States
Denial rate28.7%26.0%27.2%24.3%
Median rate spread, pp0.50.40.30.3
Originations with spread of 1.5 pp or more7.6%17.7%8.2%15.6%
Average originated loan$482k$387k$392k$329k
Home purchase share73.4%51.0%80.7%57.0%
FHA-insured share21.7%11.2%25.5%13.4%
VA-guaranteed share2.2%2.9%7.6%7.9%

Trend by year

ApplicationsOriginations

02905802022: 118 Applications2023: 173 Applications2024: 580 Applications2022: 68 Originations2023: 105 Originations2024: 368 Originations202220232024
Kind Lending, LLC in New Jersey: applications and originations, 2022–2024

This lender in stateNew Jersey, all lenders

0%14.6%29.2%2022: 29.2% This lender in state2023: 24.3% This lender in state2024: 28.7% This lender in state202220232024
Denial rate by year, state rate dashed

Loan purpose and loan type in New Jersey

By purpose

Home purchase 73% (270)Home improvement 7% (24)Refinancing 10% (36)Cash-out refinancing 10% (38)

By type

Conventional 76% (279)FHA 22% (80)VA 2% (8)USDA 0% (1)

Denial reasons as coded

Unverifiable information33.3%
Insufficient cash (downpayment, closing costs)21.3%
Other19.3%
Collateral16%
Credit application incomplete6%
Credit history3.3%
Mortgage insurance denied0.7%
Debt-to-income ratio0%
Employment history0%

Share of 150 denials in New Jersey by first denial reason coded (outlined bar: all lenders in the state).

Counties in New Jersey

CountyApplicationsOriginationsAmountDenial rate
Bergen County5142$23m16.0%
Ocean County6139$20m29.8%
Union County5231$14m33.3%
Monmouth County4130$16m23.1%
Essex County5729$14m40.8%
Hudson County4729$20m34.1%
Middlesex County4227$13m22.2%
Morris County4626$13m31.6%
Passaic County4024$10m38.5%
Cape May County2922$7.8m12.0%
Somerset County2916$7.7m—

Counties with at least 25 applications, by originations.

Questions and answers

How many mortgages did Kind Lending, LLC originate in New Jersey in 2024?

368 loans totalling $177m, from 580 applications reported for properties in New Jersey.

What is Kind Lending, LLC's denial rate in New Jersey?

28.7% of decided applications in New Jersey were denied, against 26.0% for all lenders in the state and 27.2% for this lender nationally. HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws.

Which New Jersey counties does Kind Lending, LLC lend in most?

By originations: Bergen County (42), Ocean County (39), Union County (31), Monmouth County (30), Essex County (29).

Where does this data come from?

From the 2024 public HMDA loan/application register (FFIEC and CFPB), filtered to the lender's LEI and the property state. Cells under 25 applications are withheld.

Provenance

Source: HMDA public loan/application register 2022, 2023, 2024 (FFIEC and CFPB, public domain), records for this LEI with a property in New Jersey. Built 30 Sep 2026; data through 1 Aug 2026. See methodology and corrections.