Lender Register

Lenders › Ruoff Mortgage Company › Michigan

Ruoff Mortgage Company in Michigan

HMDA record for properties in Michigan, calendar year 2024. National record · Michigan overview

LEI 549300GSCUJKJINRJ980
Reporting agency Department of Housing and Urban Development
State Michigan

HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws. The data do not include some legitimate credit risk considerations for loan approval and loan pricing decisions. Cells under 25 applications are withheld.

In Michigan, Ruoff Mortgage Company reported 1,069 applications and 723 originations for 2024, $157m in all.

Its denial rate in the state was 8.2%, below the Michigan rate of 23.9% across all lenders and compared with the lender's national rate of 8.3%.

The median rate spread on its Michigan originations was 0.4 percentage points (state median 0.5).

Applications in the state were up 27% on 2023.

1,069applications in MI, 20246.8% of the lender's total
723loans originated$157m
8.2%denial rateMI all lenders 23.9%
0.4 ppmedian rate spreadMI 0.5 pp

Compared with the state and the lender's national record

MeasureIn MichiganMichigan, all lendersRuoff Mortgage Company, all statesUnited States
Denial rate8.2%23.9%8.3%24.3%
Median rate spread, pp0.40.50.50.3
Originations with spread of 1.5 pp or more4.1%18.4%4.5%15.6%
Average originated loan$217k$212k$217k$329k
Home purchase share86.0%51.2%88.0%57.0%
FHA-insured share26.0%10.0%24.1%13.4%
VA-guaranteed share4.6%4.5%5.4%7.9%

Trend by year

ApplicationsOriginations

0674.51,3492022: 1,349 Applications2023: 841 Applications2024: 1,069 Applications2022: 832 Originations2023: 531 Originations2024: 723 Originations202220232024
Ruoff Mortgage Company in Michigan: applications and originations, 2022–2024

This lender in stateMichigan, all lenders

0%12.2%24.3%2022: 10.2% This lender in state2023: 9.5% This lender in state2024: 8.2% This lender in state202220232024
Denial rate by year, state rate dashed

Loan purpose and loan type in Michigan

By purpose

Home purchase 86% (622)Refinancing 5% (34)Cash-out refinancing 9% (67)

By type

Conventional 68% (495)FHA 26% (188)VA 5% (33)USDA 1% (7)

Denial reasons as coded

Debt-to-income ratio42.3%
Credit history25.4%
Collateral18.3%
Unverifiable information8.5%
Other4.2%
Employment history1.4%
Insufficient cash (downpayment, closing costs)0%
Credit application incomplete0%
Mortgage insurance denied0%

Share of 71 denials in Michigan by first denial reason coded (outlined bar: all lenders in the state).

Counties in Michigan

CountyApplicationsOriginationsAmountDenial rate
Jackson County169132$24m4.7%
Wayne County14681$13m13.9%
Berrien County10475$14m8.2%
St. Joseph County8270$13m4.0%
Cass County7455$12m10.6%
Macomb County5433$8.9m7.3%
Washtenaw County4532$11m2.6%
Kalamazoo County3529$7.5m6.3%
Oakland County4524$8.6m18.9%
Kent County2719$6.1m—
Muskegon County2818$3.2m—
Branch County2517$4.6m—

Counties with at least 25 applications, by originations.

Questions and answers

How many mortgages did Ruoff Mortgage Company originate in Michigan in 2024?

723 loans totalling $157m, from 1,069 applications reported for properties in Michigan.

What is Ruoff Mortgage Company's denial rate in Michigan?

8.2% of decided applications in Michigan were denied, against 23.9% for all lenders in the state and 8.3% for this lender nationally. HMDA data alone cannot be used to determine whether a lender is complying with fair lending laws.

Which Michigan counties does Ruoff Mortgage Company lend in most?

By originations: Jackson County (132), Wayne County (81), Berrien County (75), St. Joseph County (70), Cass County (55).

Where does this data come from?

From the 2024 public HMDA loan/application register (FFIEC and CFPB), filtered to the lender's LEI and the property state. Cells under 25 applications are withheld.

Provenance

Source: HMDA public loan/application register 2022, 2023, 2024 (FFIEC and CFPB, public domain), records for this LEI with a property in Michigan. Built 30 Sep 2026; data through 1 Aug 2026. See methodology and corrections.